Let’s take an example. Let’s say your production system tries to find numbers in the Fibonacci sequence:
import java.util.ArrayList;This Btrace code fragment will print out a trace string to the Btrace console every time the method calculateNext is entered:
import java.util.List;
public class FibonacciService {
private List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
public FibonacciService() {
//First two numbers in Fibonacci sequence.
list.add(0);
list.add(1);
new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
while (true) {
calculateNext();
try {
Thread.sleep(10000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}, "calc-thread").start();
}
private void calculateNext() {
int oldOld = list.get(list.size() - 2);
int old = list.get(list.size() - 1);
int newNumber = nextFibonacci(oldOld, old);
list.add(newNumber);
System.out.println(newNumber);
}
private static int nextFibonacci(int oldOld, int old) {
return oldOld + old;
}
public static void main(String args[]) {
new FibonacciService();
}
}
@OnMethod(Btrace code fragments can be attached to running java processes in two ways. Either use the command line “btrace” command or use a plugin to Suns Java VisualVM. Java VisualVM is like a Jconsole on steroids. It s is included in the JDK bundle since 1.6 update 7 (or something like that). You will find it in the JDK installation directory (either in tools, or in bin). Follow these instructions to add Btrace capabilities to VisualVM: http://btrace.dev.java.net/visualvm_uc.html.
clazz="se.lesc.btrace_example1.FibonacciService",
method="calculateNext"
)
public static void onStartCalc() {
println("Starting to calculate new number...");
}
When installed, right click on the process and select “Trace application…”.
Then paste (or write) the code fragment and press Start. When pressing Start it takes a few seconds for the code to be instrumented. The output is shown in the console below the code fragment.
A little bit more advanced fragment that will print the method arguments when the method nextFibonacci is called:
@OnMethod(A fragment that prints out the return value when the nextFibonacci method is returned:
clazz="se.lesc.btrace_example1.FibonacciService",
method="nextFibonacci"
)
public static void onNextFibonacci(int oldOld, int old) {
print("Input values are ");
print(str(oldOld));
print(" and " );
print(str(old));
println();
}
@OnMethod(There are some restrictions on how advanced the fragments can be. Because the code must never get stuck loops are not allowed. Creating objects arbitrary is not allowed nor calling any methods (except from the BTraceUtils class).
clazz="se.lesc.btrace_example1.FibonacciService",
method="nextFibonacci",
location=@Location(Kind.RETURN)
)
public static void onNextFibonacci(int returnValue) {
print("Result is: ");
print(str(returnValue));
println();
}
Everything is not good about Btrace:
- Slow web page. Perhaps not Btrace fault. The entire *.dev.java.net servers are so slow that it is annoying.
- There is always a risk when instrumenting the code. Out of about 30 runs I had 3 unexpected crashes of the JVM that I can remember. It is with other words somewhat of a risk to run Btrace in a production environment.
- Some features don’t work. For example I tried to use a regular expression to match a method but every time I got java.lang.VerifyError (Edit: I've now submitted a bug report for it: https://btrace.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41). Another example is that I tried to get a reference to the current object in side a method, but it did not work.
- The documentation is need improvment. For example Btrace uses some kind of signature matching to find methods with arguments. How this matching is done is not documented. Such a central feature is really important to have documented.
- The project does not look to be actively developed. The last implemented ticket was submitted the 22th of February in 2009. Even critical and easy to fix problems is not fixed. For example in my opinion the bug about that Btrace cannot be run on Windows when there exist a space in the path should really be fixed. Edit: the project apparently has active development, based on the comments on this blog entry. :)
Hi Lennart,
ReplyDeletethanks for mentioning the BTrace. It feels good to know somebody is using it :)
I am actively participating in the BTrace development (just to give my background here) and as such I would like to clarify som your "bad points":
* Slow web page - well, that's really the java.net fault. It's becoming slower and slower every day :(
* JVM crashes - if you are using rather recent updates of JDK6 and still experiencing crashes, plz, file a bug. Probably it will be redirected to JVM but it's good to keep track of these situations anyway.
* Regular expressions should work without a hitch. If you are experiencing VerifyError, plz, file a bug so we can take a look into it.
* The quality of documentation - well, except the wizardry with parameters matching, I thing it is not so bad. Also, plz note, that there is ongoing work to make parameter matching easier
* And the last - the project activity. BTrace is being developed by 2 people as their pet project. Any participants are welcome, either in the code area or documentation.
Please, bear in mind that BTrace is not a commercial product - if you see some deficiencies, you can participate to improve things (as in any other OSS project).
I hope we'll get the bugs preventing you from being a happy BTrace user, eliminated.
Cheers
JB
It's good to know there is an active development in BTrace! I like the idea and concept of it. I think the program really has potential if some of the bugs are fixed. To include it in VisualVM was a really good strategy.
ReplyDeleteI will try to submit bug reports to the bugs I have found!